We’re receiving a number of inquiries from supporters of cities that weren’t included in our report, and the bottom line is that in order for these cities to get on the digital radar, they need to organize their approach by relevant search terms that supporters can find easily and, once connected, more effectively contribute to the campaign. That’s the value of these reports. This is an exercise in demonstrating to viewers the value of developing organized, measurable digital (and social media, etc.) campaigns in order to get the greatest value for the time and spend. The cities that tend to have a more fragmented social media approach (for example, Ann Arbor titling two separate Facebook pages “A2 Fiber” and “Ann Arbor for Google Fiber”) are making it more difficult to be heard as a single voice on a national level and are running the risk of going unnoticed. The way to get noticed beyond your local efforts is to get organized and create a unified, holistic digital/social media strategy of relevant, searchable content. Continue reading
Tag Archives: insights
The Race is On(line) for Google Fiber – How the Candidates are Faring in the Digital Space
With community events for Google’s fiber initiative beginning on March 19th and the growing level of online community involvement that’s building here in Grand Rapids, we put together the first in a series of reports measuring the digital conversations and online efforts surrounding the participating cities looking to have Google’s hyper-speed fiber communications lines installed, creating a rank of the top 10 candidate cities by share of the total conversation happening around the initiative online.
This first report ranks the aspiring cities by share of total number of mentions in conversations happening between February 15 to March 17 on digital media channels, and we’ll continue to publish reports weekly showing the collected digital efforts and rankings of the top 10 cities until Google makes its final choice.
Google has multiple factors in their decision making process, including how interested a community is in working with Google, community support, local activities, needs and resources, approved construction methods, local regulatory issues and area broadband speeds. Most participating cities assert that online interaction in their campaigns will increase the chances of favorability in their selection by Google, and we’ll be presenting the data and insights that will ultimately show how important a factor online share of voice is in the process.
The first report is available for download here. Just click on the image below. And stay tuned for additional reports in the coming weeks.
UPDATE: As we continue our research and measurement for our next report, we’ve noticed that some cities’ online efforts are being conducted around nicknames relevant to their campaigns or local communities, rather than the direct name of the city (Ann Arbor and Sarasota, we’re looking at you!). Based on this, we’re filtering at more detailed levels to make sure we’re capturing that information and reporting accurately. We invite any city involved in the initiative NOT directly using their name for their online efforts to reach out to us (either through a comment below or through our Twitter feed – @steketeegreiner) with any specific search terms to make sure that we have your city represented properly.
New Strategies for Managing Social Relationships – SRM
Back in 2002, when we were trying to get our new catalog company off the ground, we quickly learned the value of a customer. The old saying “it is easier to keep a customer than get a new one” came to life when we were buying names of prospects and less than 1.2% of them became customers. The house list was our bread and butter and we learned how to squeeze every last drop of value out of it. We quickly became experts in segmenting our list using the RFM model: Recency, Frequency and Monetary value. It worked well. A new customer was a live customer and we did everything we could to let them know they were valued and keep them engaged. We incentivized heavily to increase purchase frequency and treated our best customers like royalty. Now, segmentation goes much deeper and CRM models have become much more sophisticated, but the same fundamental principles still apply. Today, with brands engaging customers through social channels, how are these relationships managed? What are the rules in a world driven by return on engagement not return on investment? Social Media is changing the brand-to-consumer relationship driving the need for new strategies to take advantage. We call this new strategic approach Social Relationship Management (SRM). Continue reading